Monitoring progress of merges can be useful for users for large
repositories or complex merge processes that take some time.
This enables setting a monitor. Existing merge implementations in jgit
do not yet report progress if a monitor is set. This will be added in a
later change.
Change-Id: I17b978b3fc91750dd88649638b90a46820a0877c
Signed-off-by: Laurent Delaigue <laurent.delaigue@obeo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Monitoring progress of merges can be useful for users for large
repositories or complex merge processes that take some time.
This enables setting a monitor. Existing merge implementations in jgit
do not yet report progress if a monitor is set. This will be added in a
later change.
Change-Id: I17b978b3fc91750dd88649638b90a46820a0877c
Signed-off-by: Laurent Delaigue <laurent.delaigue@obeo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Null-annotated Ref class and fixed related compiler errors
This change fixes all compiler errors in JGit and replaces possible
NPE's with either appropriate exceptions, avoiding multiple "Nullable
return" method calls or early returning from the method.
Change-Id: I24c8a600ec962d61d5f40abf73eac4203e115240
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Null-annotated Repository class and fixed related compiler errors
org.eclipse.jgit.lib.Repository class is an example of the API which
should be written with Java 8 java.util.Optional<T> type. Unfortunately
this API is already released and widely used. The good clients are
currently doing their best with checking return values for null and bad
clients do not know how bad their code is.
I've tried not to change any logic and to be as less intrusive as
possible. Most of the JGit code was well prepared to this, only few
classes needed some smaller fixes.
This change fixes all compiler errors in JGit and replaces possible
NPE's with either appropriate exceptions, avoiding multiple "Nullable
return" method calls or early returning from the method.
Because annotating getDirectory() and getFS() as Nullable would cause
lot of additional changes in JGit and EGit they are postponed.
Change-Id: Ie8369d2c9c5fac5ce83b3b1b9bc217d7b55502a3
Signed-off-by: Andrey Loskutov <loskutov@gmx.de>
Raise error if FileNotFoundException is caught for an existing file
File, FileInputStream and friends may throw FileNotFoundException even
if the file is existing e.g. when file permissions don't allow to access
the file content. In most cases this is a severe error we should not
suppress hence rethrow the FileNotFoundException in this case.
This may also fix bug 451508.
Bug: 451508
Change-Id: If4a94217fb5b7cfd4c04d881902f3e86193c7008
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
These commands' monitor fields can never be null unless someone passes
null to setProgressMonitor. Anyone passing null probably meant to
disable the ProgressMonitor, so do that (by falling back to
NullProgressMonitor.INSTANCE) instead of saving a null and eventually
producing NullPointerException.
Change-Id: I63ad93ea8ad669fd333a5fd40880e7583ba24827
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrn@google.com>
Use AutoClosable to close resources in bundle org.eclipse.jgit
- use try-with-resource where possible
- replace use of deprecated release() by close()
Change-Id: I0f139c3535679087b7fa09649166bca514750b81
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Make RepositoryState.REBASING_MERGE reachable again.
If a non interactive rebase is launched, stopping after a conflict
should set the repository state to RepositoryState.REBASING_MERGE
instead of RepositoryState.REBASING_INTERACTIVE.
Bug: 452623
Change-Id: Ie885aab6d71dabd158a718af0d14fff643c9b850
Also-by: Arthur Daussy <arthur.daussy@obeo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Delaigue <laurent.delaigue@obeo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Introduce support for the pre-commit hook into JGit, along with the
--no-verify commit command option to bypass it when rebasing /
cherry-picking.
Change-Id: If86df98577fa56c5c03d783579c895a38bee9d18
Signed-off-by: Laurent Goubet <laurent.goubet@obeo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
RebaseCommand should ignore submodule modifications
Before a rebase happens the RebaseCommand checks that the working tree
is clean. We don't want to start a rebase on a dirty working tree. If
the working tree is dirty a rebase should not be allowed. But
RebaseCommand should ignore modifications done to submodules. E.g. if a
submodules HEAD points to <x> but the root repository has in index that
the submodule should point to <y> then this should not prohibit a
rebase. Also native git allows a rebase in this case. Since jgit's
StatusCommand has learned to ignore submodule changes this is now used
by the RebaseCommand to determine the repository state correctly.
Bug: 446922
Change-Id: I487bf7484dca3f5501e6e514584e2871524eea19
With --preserve-merges C Git re-does merges using the rewritten merge
parents, discarding the old merge commit. For the common use-case of
pull with rebase this is unfortunate, as it loses the merge conflict
resolution (and other fixes in the merge), which may have taken quite
some time to get right in the first place.
To overcome this we use a two-fold approach:
If any of the (non-first) merge parents of a merge were rewritten, we
also redo the merge, to include the (potential) new changes in those
commits.
If only the first parent was rewritten, i.e. we are merging a branch
that is otherwise unaffected by the rebase, we instead cherry-pick the
merge commit at hand. This is done with the --mainline 1 and --no-commit
options to apply the changes introduced by the merge. Then we set up an
appropriate MERGE_HEAD and commit the result, thus effectively forging a
merge.
Apart from the approach taken to rebase merge commits, this
implementation closely follows C Git. As a result, both Git
implementations can continue rebases of each other.
Preserving merges works for both interactive and non-interactive rebase,
but as in C Git it is easy do get undesired outcomes with interactive
rebase.
CommitCommand supports committing merges during rebase now.
Bug: 439421
Change-Id: I4cf69b9d4ec6109d130ab8e3f42fcbdac25a13b2
Signed-off-by: Konrad Kügler <swamblumat-eclipsebugs@yahoo.de>
Rebase: Write an empty "quiet" file to make C Git happy
C git tries to read this file from the rebase state directory and
complains about it not being there for rebases started by JGit. An empty
'quiet' file represents the (verbose) default.
Change-Id: I1844ccbf8d35442d7a8918b57b67eb9b9efd6352
Signed-off-by: Konrad Kügler <swamblumat-eclipsebugs@yahoo.de>
The change includes comparing symbolic links between disk and index,
adding symbolic links to the index, creating/modifying links on
checkout. The behavior is controlled by the core.symlinks setting, just
as C Git does. When a new repository is created core.symlinks will be
set depending on the capabilities of the operating system and Java
runtime.
If core.symlinks is set to true, the assumption is that symlinks are
supported, which may result in runtime errors if this turns out not to
be the case.
Measuring the cost of jgit status on a repository with ~70000 files,
of which ~30000 are tracked reveals a penalty of about 10% for using
the Java7 (really NIO2) support module.
Bug: 354367
Change-Id: I12f0fdd9d26212324a586896ef7eb1f6ff89c39c
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fix fast forward rebase with rebase.autostash=true
The folder .git/rebase-merge was not removed in this case. The
repository was then still in rebase state, but neither abort nor
continue worked.
Bug: 425742
Change-Id: I43cea6c9e5f3cef9d6b15643722fddecb40632d9
This feature was introduced in native git with version 1.8.4.
Bug: 422951
Change-Id: I42f194174d64d7ada6631e2156c2a7bf93b5e91c
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Do not allow non-ff-rebase if there are uncommitted changes
With this change jgit checks for uncommitted changes before a rebase is
started. This is also done by native git. One reason is that an abort
would override such changes. The check is skipped for a non-interactive
rebase when it will result in a fast-forward. In this case there can be
only checkout conflicts but no merge conflicts, so there cannot be an
abort which overrides uncommitted changes.
Bug: 422352
Change-Id: I1e0b59b2a4d80a686b67a6729e441924362b1236
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fix FIXUP error for blank lines in interactive rebase
Empty lines of discarded commit messages were added to the commit
message because they were not commented out properly.
Bug: 422246
Change-Id: I263e8a6b30a3392d8b4f09c0695505068a0a485d
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Interactive Rebase: Do actions if there were conflicts
If a commit was marked for edit, reword, squash or fixup, but the
interactive rebase stopped because of a conflict, the step was not done
after conflict resolution. This is done now.
Change-Id: If8e7ccc50469165744f2b8a53d180f9ba0f72330
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Rebase interactive should finish if last step is edit
When the last step was an edit step, rebase interactive did not finish
after continuing the rebase. Instead, it returned with the status
FAST_FORWARD.
Change-Id: Ib19857474ac089dfeaae665ad5e95c66c21099b0
With the new RebaseResult.EDIT a client can now distinguish if rebase
stopped due to a conflict or because the commit was marked for edit in
an interactive rebase.
Change-Id: I40f2311cf43ed5f290dcda65a7bd85ba770a85f5
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Add Squash/Fixup support for rebase interactive in RebaseCommand
The rebase command now supports squash and fixup. Both actions are not
allowed as the first step of the rebase.
In JGit, before any rebase step is performed, the next commit is
already cherry-picked. This commit keeps that behaviour. In case of
squash or fixup a soft reset to the parent is perfomed afterwards.
CQ: 7684
Bug: 396510
Change-Id: I3c4190940b4d7f19860e223d647fc78705e57203
Signed-off-by: Tobias Pfeifer <to.pfeifer@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Enable to prepare interactive rebase and then start it explicitly
Add Operation.PROCESS_STEPS to RebaseCommand to enable starting
interactive rebase explicitly after rebase steps have been configured.
Change-Id: I2d6f0de82010ea6523fbce6fb4501e847bdcdddc
Signed-off-by: Tobias Pfeifer <to.pfeifer@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Enhance reading of git-rebase-todo formatted files
Reading and writing files formatted like the git-rebase-todo files was
hidden in the RebaseCommand. Certain constructs (like leading tabs and
spaces) have not been handled as in native git. Also the upcoming
rebase interactive feature in EGit needs reading/writing these files
independently from a RebaseCommand.
Therefore reading and writing those files has been moved to the
Repository class. RebaseCommand gets smaller because of that and doesn't
have to deal with reading/writing files.
Additional tests for empty todo-list files, or files containing comments
have been added.
Change-Id: I323f3619952fecdf28ddf50139a88e0bea34f5ba
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Also-by: Tobias Pfeifer <to.pfeifer@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
As noticed by Robin Rosenberg in review of
I4eb87c850078ca187b38b81cc91c92afb1176945.
Change-Id: If96d66b6c025ad8f2f47829c933f3c65ab6cbeef
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Support aborting non-interactive rebase started from C Git
Continuing is trickier, as .git/rebase-apply contains no message file
and no git-rebase-todo.
Bug: 336820
Change-Id: I4eb87c850078ca187b38b81cc91c92afb1176945
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Rebase computes the list of commits that are included in
the merges, just like Git does, so do not try to include
the merge commits. Re-recreating merges during rebase is
a bit more complicated and might be a useful future extension,
but for now just linearize during rebase.
Change-Id: I61239d265f395e5ead580df2528e46393dc6bdbd
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
This converts a checkout conflict exception into a RebaseResult /
MergeResult containing the conflicting paths, which enables EGit (or
others) to handle the situation in a user-friendly way
Change-Id: I48d9bdcc1e98095576513a54a225a42409f301f3
A few classes such as Constanrs are marked with @SuppressWarnings, as are
toString() methods with many liternal, but otherwise $NLS-n$ is used for
string containing text that should not be translated. A few literals may
fall into the gray zone, but mostly I've tried to only tag the obvious
ones.
Change-Id: I22e50a77e2bf9e0b842a66bdf674e8fa1692f590
The 'edit' command allows you to change arbitrary commit
content and the message of any commit in the repository.
Bug: 394577
Change-Id: I43a44782cdb10b29f13784fa75ab37fe5d4da01b
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Luksza <dariusz@luksza.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>
Add support for rebase interactive 'reword' command
'reword' command is used to change commit message of any
commit in git history.
Bug: 394575
Change-Id: Ic974e76dfd923fd6f0cb8f07d1a6fbecd9abbf31
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Luksza <dariusz@luksza.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>
EGit should be able to continue a rebase started by C Git.
Change-Id: I63058026295fec34157b5687ae87ae9cb0c27c86
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Improve ours/theirs conflict markers for rebase, cherry-pick
On conflicts in rebase or cherry-pick, the conflict markers were like
this:
<<<<<<< OURS
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> THEIRS
This is technically correct, but it could be better.
It's especially confusing during a rebase, where the meaning of
OURS/THEIRS is not obvious. The intuition is that "ours" is the commits
that "I" did before the rebase, but it's the other way around because of
the way rebase works. See various bug reports and stackoverflow
discussions.
With this change, in the case of a cherry-pick while on master, the
markers will be like this:
<<<<<<< master
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> bad1dea Message of the commit I'm cherry-picking
In the case of a "git rebase master":
<<<<<<< Upstream, based on master
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing
It's not "master" because that would only be correct for the first
cherry-pick during a rebase, after that, it's master + already
cherry-picked commits.
And in the case of a "git pull --rebase":
<<<<<<< Upstream, based on branch 'master' of git@example.org:repo
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing
Bug: 336819
Change-Id: I1333a8dd170bb0077f491962013485efb6f2a926
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Matthias Sohn
Laurent Delaigue
Andrey Loskutov
Jonathan Nieder
Laurent Goubet
Christian Halstrick
Robin Rosenberg
Konrad Kügler
Stefan Lay
Tobias Pfeifer
Robin Stocker
Markus Duft
Dariusz Luksza