Fix FIXUP error for blank lines in interactive rebase
Empty lines of discarded commit messages were added to the commit
message because they were not commented out properly.
Bug: 422246
Change-Id: I263e8a6b30a3392d8b4f09c0695505068a0a485d
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Interactive Rebase: Do actions if there were conflicts
If a commit was marked for edit, reword, squash or fixup, but the
interactive rebase stopped because of a conflict, the step was not done
after conflict resolution. This is done now.
Change-Id: If8e7ccc50469165744f2b8a53d180f9ba0f72330
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Rebase interactive should finish if last step is edit
When the last step was an edit step, rebase interactive did not finish
after continuing the rebase. Instead, it returned with the status
FAST_FORWARD.
Change-Id: Ib19857474ac089dfeaae665ad5e95c66c21099b0
With the new RebaseResult.EDIT a client can now distinguish if rebase
stopped due to a conflict or because the commit was marked for edit in
an interactive rebase.
Change-Id: I40f2311cf43ed5f290dcda65a7bd85ba770a85f5
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Add Squash/Fixup support for rebase interactive in RebaseCommand
The rebase command now supports squash and fixup. Both actions are not
allowed as the first step of the rebase.
In JGit, before any rebase step is performed, the next commit is
already cherry-picked. This commit keeps that behaviour. In case of
squash or fixup a soft reset to the parent is perfomed afterwards.
CQ: 7684
Bug: 396510
Change-Id: I3c4190940b4d7f19860e223d647fc78705e57203
Signed-off-by: Tobias Pfeifer <to.pfeifer@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Lay <stefan.lay@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Enable to prepare interactive rebase and then start it explicitly
Add Operation.PROCESS_STEPS to RebaseCommand to enable starting
interactive rebase explicitly after rebase steps have been configured.
Change-Id: I2d6f0de82010ea6523fbce6fb4501e847bdcdddc
Signed-off-by: Tobias Pfeifer <to.pfeifer@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Enhance reading of git-rebase-todo formatted files
Reading and writing files formatted like the git-rebase-todo files was
hidden in the RebaseCommand. Certain constructs (like leading tabs and
spaces) have not been handled as in native git. Also the upcoming
rebase interactive feature in EGit needs reading/writing these files
independently from a RebaseCommand.
Therefore reading and writing those files has been moved to the
Repository class. RebaseCommand gets smaller because of that and doesn't
have to deal with reading/writing files.
Additional tests for empty todo-list files, or files containing comments
have been added.
Change-Id: I323f3619952fecdf28ddf50139a88e0bea34f5ba
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
Also-by: Tobias Pfeifer <to.pfeifer@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
As noticed by Robin Rosenberg in review of
I4eb87c850078ca187b38b81cc91c92afb1176945.
Change-Id: If96d66b6c025ad8f2f47829c933f3c65ab6cbeef
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Support aborting non-interactive rebase started from C Git
Continuing is trickier, as .git/rebase-apply contains no message file
and no git-rebase-todo.
Bug: 336820
Change-Id: I4eb87c850078ca187b38b81cc91c92afb1176945
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Rebase computes the list of commits that are included in
the merges, just like Git does, so do not try to include
the merge commits. Re-recreating merges during rebase is
a bit more complicated and might be a useful future extension,
but for now just linearize during rebase.
Change-Id: I61239d265f395e5ead580df2528e46393dc6bdbd
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
This converts a checkout conflict exception into a RebaseResult /
MergeResult containing the conflicting paths, which enables EGit (or
others) to handle the situation in a user-friendly way
Change-Id: I48d9bdcc1e98095576513a54a225a42409f301f3
A few classes such as Constanrs are marked with @SuppressWarnings, as are
toString() methods with many liternal, but otherwise $NLS-n$ is used for
string containing text that should not be translated. A few literals may
fall into the gray zone, but mostly I've tried to only tag the obvious
ones.
Change-Id: I22e50a77e2bf9e0b842a66bdf674e8fa1692f590
The 'edit' command allows you to change arbitrary commit
content and the message of any commit in the repository.
Bug: 394577
Change-Id: I43a44782cdb10b29f13784fa75ab37fe5d4da01b
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Luksza <dariusz@luksza.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>
Add support for rebase interactive 'reword' command
'reword' command is used to change commit message of any
commit in git history.
Bug: 394575
Change-Id: Ic974e76dfd923fd6f0cb8f07d1a6fbecd9abbf31
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Luksza <dariusz@luksza.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <zx@twitter.com>
EGit should be able to continue a rebase started by C Git.
Change-Id: I63058026295fec34157b5687ae87ae9cb0c27c86
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Improve ours/theirs conflict markers for rebase, cherry-pick
On conflicts in rebase or cherry-pick, the conflict markers were like
this:
<<<<<<< OURS
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> THEIRS
This is technically correct, but it could be better.
It's especially confusing during a rebase, where the meaning of
OURS/THEIRS is not obvious. The intuition is that "ours" is the commits
that "I" did before the rebase, but it's the other way around because of
the way rebase works. See various bug reports and stackoverflow
discussions.
With this change, in the case of a cherry-pick while on master, the
markers will be like this:
<<<<<<< master
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> bad1dea Message of the commit I'm cherry-picking
In the case of a "git rebase master":
<<<<<<< Upstream, based on master
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing
It's not "master" because that would only be correct for the first
cherry-pick during a rebase, after that, it's master + already
cherry-picked commits.
And in the case of a "git pull --rebase":
<<<<<<< Upstream, based on branch 'master' of git@example.org:repo
a
=======
b
>>>>>>> b161dea Message of a commit I'm rebasing
Bug: 336819
Change-Id: I1333a8dd170bb0077f491962013485efb6f2a926
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
When starting a rebase with C Git, there may be empty lines in the
git-rebase-todo file. Before this change, JGit would fail to parse the
file with e.g. the following exception:
JGitInternalException: Unknown or unsupported command "
#", only "pick" is allowed.
This happened when there was an empty line just before the comments,
because the nextSpace would be the one from the comment. Now the empty
lines are ignored by checking for nextSpace < ptr outside of the loop.
Change-Id: I94ad299f367c846e7729c74f49c6b8f93f75ae81
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
- Translate internal exceptions to corresponding API exception
- Do not catch GitAPI exceptions internally to an internal
exception. Just pass them to caller
- Mention thrown exceptions in javadoc
Change-Id: I9044cf86d2b0bcc8b63b7cc016e1bf0055a62053
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Write the old object id from the RefUpdate to the
ORIG_HEAD file after the update completes.
Add two new convenience methods to Repository to read
and write the ORIG_HEAD reference similar to the methods
for reading/writing CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD.
Bug: 375525
Change-Id: I120b3b2cd3b1ddae88fce435285bae15cbf96f5e
Git API does not declare GitAPIException call() and related cleanups
All commands should throw a GitAPIException so new exceptions can be
added without breaking the builds of old code, i.e. anyone that calls
a Git API should catch GitAPIException and not just the currently known
exceptions.
Now the only checked exceptions on Git API calls are GitException and
subclasses of it. New checked exceptions that are subclasses of
GitException may be added without breaking the API.
Javadoc for GitAPIException is declared on GitCommand and
inherited to subclasses. JGitInternalException is not explicitly
documented anymore.
Unfortunately this change itself breaks the API. The intention is
that it shall be possible to add new checked subclasses of
GitAPIException without breaking the API.
Bug: 366914
EGit-Change-Id: I50380f13fc82c22d0036f47c7859cc3a77e767c5
Change-Id: I50380f13fc82c22d0036f47c7859cc3a77e767c5
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Fix rebase > continue when nothing left to commit.
If after resolving all conflicts nothing is left to commit, return
an according result, so that downstreams (EGit, ...) can behave like
cgit, and display a nice message informing the user.
Currently, EGit displays a "HEAD advanced fast forward" message, which
is absolutely not helpful at all.
This is the basic API revamping required to get that state communicated
to the outside world (EGit).
Bug: 336812
Change-Id: If2665005cf54a5b51c0fe80bad019fa42b0205af
Checkout command should throw o.e.j.api.errors.CheckoutConflictException
which is a GitAPIException not o.e.j.errors.CheckoutConflictException.
PullCommand should rethrow the API exception as a JGitInternalException.
Bug: 356922
Change-Id: I865c4905997d9834c85a97fbe7287604daf99075
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
A checkout conflict during rebase setup should leave the repository
in SAFE state which means ensuring that the rebase temporary files
need to be removed.
Bug: 346813
Change-Id: If8b758fde73ed5a452a99a195a844825a03bae1a
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Implement rebase ff for upstream branches with merge commits
Change Ib9898fe0f982fa08e41f1dca9452c43de715fdb6 added support for
the 'cherry-pick' fast forward case where the upstream commit history
does not include any merge commits. This change adds support for the
case where merge commits exist and the local branch has no changes.
Bug: 344779
Change-Id: If203ce5aa1b4e5d4d7982deb621b710e71f4ee10
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
Add handling of CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file in .git (similar to MERGE_HEAD),
which is written in case of a conflicting cherry-pick merge.
It is used so that Repository.getRepositoryState can return the new
states CHERRY_PICKING and CHERRY_PICKING_RESOLVED. These states, as well
as CHERRY_PICK_HEAD can be used in EGit to properly show the merge tool.
Also, in case of a conflict, MERGE_MSG is written with the original
commit message and a "Conflicts" section appended. This way, the
cherry-picked message is not lost and can later be re-used in the commit
dialog.
Bug: 339092
Change-Id: I947967fdc2f1d55016c95106b104c2afcc9797a1
Signed-off-by: Robin Stocker <robin@nibor.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@gmail.com>
In case an underlying cherry-pick fails due to uncommitted changes, a
RebaseCommand shall fail and roll-back changes.
Change-Id: Ic22eb047fb03ac2c8391f777036b7dbf22a1b061
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
In order to distinguish cherry-pick failures caused by conflicts vs.
'abnormal failures' (e.g. due to unstaged changes or a dirty
worktree), a CherryPickResult class is introduced and returned by
CherryPickCommand.call() instead of a RevCommit. This new class is
similar to MergeResult and RebaseResult. The CherryPickResult contains
all necessary information, e.g. paths causing the cherry-pick (a merge
called within, respectively) to fail. This allows callers to better
react on failures.
Change-Id: I5db57b9259e82ed118e4bf4ec94463efe68b8c1f
Signed-off-by: Philipp Thun <philipp.thun@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
After consulting with Christian Halstrick, it turned out that the
handling of rebase during pull was implemented incorrectly.
Change-Id: I40f03409e080cdfeceb21460150f5e02a016e7f4
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
RebaseCommand: detect and handle fast-forward properly
This bug was hidden by an incomplete test: the current Rebase
implementation using the "git rebase -i" pattern does not work
correctly if fast-forwarding is involved. The reason for this is that
the log command does not return any commits in this case.
In addition, a check for already merged commits was introduced to
avoid spurious conflicts.
Change-Id: Ib9898fe0f982fa08e41f1dca9452c43de715fdb6
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
[findbugs] Do not ignore exceptional return value of mkdir
java.io.File.mkdir() and mkdirs() report failure as an exceptional
return value false. Fix the code which silently ignored this
exceptional return value.
Change-Id: I41244f4b9d66176e68e2c07e2329cf08492f8619
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Rebase: abort on unknown/unsupported command in git-rebase-todo
This is needed to ensure interoperability with the command line: if
the git-rebase-todo file was created manually (by git rebase -i in the
command line), and any commands other than pick are used (reword,
edit, fixup, squash) JGit must abort as it does not understand these
commands yet.
The same is true if an unknown command is found (e.g. due to a typo);
this is the same behavior as shown by the command line.
Change-Id: I2322014f69460361f7fc09da223e8a5c31f100dd
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
Rebase: fix wrong update if original HEAD after Merge+Skip
Rebase would update the original HEAD to the wrong commit when
"skipping" the last commit after a merged commit.
Includes a test for the specific situation.
Change-Id: I087314b1834a3f11a4561f04ca5c21411d54d993
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
For --continue, the Rebase command asserts that there are no unmerged
paths in the current repository. Then it checks if a commit is needed.
If yes, the commit message and author are taken from the author_script
and message files, respectively, and a commit is performed before the
next step is applied.
For --skip, the workspace is reset to the current HEAD before applying
the next step.
Includes some tests and a refactoring that extracts Strings in the
code into constants.
Change-Id: I72d9968535727046e737ec20e23239fe79976179
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Halstrick <christian.halstrick@sap.com>
java.io.File.delete() reports failure as an exceptional
return value false. Fix the code which silently ignored
this exceptional return value. Also remove some duplicate
deletion helper methods.
Change-Id: I80ed20ca1f07a2bc6e779957a4ad0c713789c5be
Signed-off-by: Matthias Sohn <matthias.sohn@sap.com>
Rebase Interoperability third part: handle stop upon conflict
There are some files that need to exist so that the CLI can continue
after the rebase has been stopped due to conflicts
Change-Id: I3cb4dc98609c059bf0cf9fd5f9e47a9c681cea2d
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
Rebase Interoperability second part: fix "pop steps"
If the CLI stops a rebase upon conflict, the current
step is already popped from the git-rebase-todo and appended to the
"done" file. The current implementation wrongly pops the step only
after successful cherry-pick.
Change-Id: I8640dda0cbb2a5271ecf75fcbad69410122eeab6
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
Rebase Interoperability first part: write "interactive" file
The Repository is then in state "Rebase interactive".
Change-Id: I5d2de57f8670e1d4c71ed22509ab17f04e2561b5
Signed-off-by: Mathias Kinzler <mathias.kinzler@sap.com>
Stefan Lay
Matthias Sohn
Tobias Pfeifer
Christian Halstrick
Robin Rosenberg
Robin Stocker
Markus Duft
Dariusz Luksza
Kevin Sawicki
Tomasz Zarna
Bernard Leach
Chris Aniszczyk
Philipp Thun
Mathias Kinzler