User relative paths for images instead.
In one case, we need to copy images from a subdirectory one level up,
because otherwise the images are only found in the included document,
but not in the single-page one including it from the subdirectory. In
all other cases, included ADOCs are located in the same directory as the
including document.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- The website is just a front page.
- I failed to contact anyone via:
* fb9553b7471df638478bbf918044bf52.gdrp@customers.whoisprivacycorp.com
* info@aosd.net
* admin@aosd.net
- The discuss@aosd.net mailing list had its last post 6 years ago and
the last one concerning AspectJ 11 years ago according to the archive
at https://discuss.aosd.narkive.com/.
Mention Spring support for native AspectJ an Spring AOP as a real world
example in the FAQ.
Also remove an FAQ link to a no longer existing PARC website about
AspectJ and fix a small typo.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Add Java syntax highlighting to AspectJ and Java files
- Add XML syntax highlighting to XML files (Ant, LTW etc.)
- Dedent and remove empty lines, where necessary
- Enclose in-line line numbers for Java code in /*23*/ comments in order
to enable Java formatting
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add initial set of AsciiDoc files, converted from HTML/XML
Some originals have been deleted already. Others, especially the user
guides, still exist in both formats because they have not been
proof-read and probably lots of links do not function as expected. But I
want to see what the files look like directly on GitHun.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Use new constant Main.MINIMAL_JRE_VERSION (currently = 17) and
SourceVersion.latest().ordinal() to check, if the minimal JRE version
requirement for AJC is met. If not, then exit with code -1 and error
message "The AspectJ compiler needs at least Java runtime 17".
Relates to #269.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
The new version is compiled to target 17. This should avoid the strange
"NoSuchFieldError: RELEASE_17" error message in AJC.
Closes #269.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release
than directly a Java 22 release.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
TODO: Due to eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.core#1719, one line per test is
currently rendered incorrectly. After the upstream fix, change
"\Bill \Duck" to "Bill Duck".
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Until now, the CI build did not run Java 21 tests, but they look OK
locally. Now, let's find out what GitHub Actions says.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add missing file RecordPatternsPreview1ExhaustivenessOK1.java for JDK 21
This file was missing, which did not trigger an error in CI builds,
because AllTestsAspectJ1921 was not part of the AllTests19 suite before.
The latter will be fixed in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
AjcTaskTest: Be more lenient with aspectjrt version warning
Filter out a warning which occurs, if the current release does not match
the stored binary in lib/test:
bad version number found in aspectjrt.jar
expected 1.9.21.M1 found 1.9.20.1
If e.g. we run tests for a milestone release a.b.5.M1 and afterwards
switch back to a.b.5-SNAPSHOT, we do not want to update lib/test for a
single commit, just to make this test pass. Hence, we ignore this
warning here.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
RELEASE.md: Add '--add-opens' info for Nexus Staging 'rc:release'
Sonatype has not solved the problems in Nexus Staging Maven Plugin for
years, so it makes sense to document them.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Alexander Kriegisch
Andy Russell