- Improvement: Also add CompilationAndWeavingContext for constructor
with causing exception
- Remove home-brew stack trace printing, just call super constructors
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Bugfix: Flush stream.
- Adjust format to more closely resemble JVM format. E.g., do not print
the causing exception name twice.
- Add TODO, because this whole custom stack trace printing can just go
away. The JVM format should do just fine. This commit is merely meant
to document the decision to remove the cruft in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
New Xlint warning 'arrayCannotBeVoid' when resolving 'void[]'
Because void arrays are illegal (and nonsensical), now there is a new
Xlint warning whenever World.resolve resolves a new 'void[]'. Because
in the World class we do not have any source context, no path + line
number are logged. The user only sees something like:
[warning] arrays cannot have a void type, but found 'void[]' in
pointcut [Xlint:arrayCannotBeVoid]
Then later, if due to the returned MissingResolvedTypeWithKnownSignature
type a joinpoint does not match, there is an additional
my/path/MyAspect.aj:42 [warning] advice defined in MyAspect has not
been applied [Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch]
log line, but not necessarily anywhere near the former one.
On the one hand, this is better than nothing. OTOH, comparing the
situation with no logging message other than Xlint:adviceDidNotMatch in
case of something equally illegal like 'Foo<int>' (primitive generic
type parameter), this is actually more than we have in several other
situations and might even be regarded as superfluous. In case of
multiple 'void[]' cases within a big number of aspects, the same aspect
or even the same pointcut, the user would have no clue where exactly to
search for it. He would just see multiple log messages without source
context.
One option would be to set 'arrayCannotBeVoid=ignore' in
XlintDefault.properties, so the user would have to explicitly activate
it. But IMO, this message should be visible by default.
Another option would be to find out how to defer logging the messages
until later similarly to BcelWeaver.warnOnUnmatchedAdvice and then to
bulk-print them. But in order to achieve that, the information about the
existence of any 'void[]' occurrences would have to be stored in a flag
similar to BcelAdvice.hasMatchedAtLeastOnce, bloating BcelAdvice for
that rare case. Alternatively, each advice pointcut could be
heuristically scanned for the literal substring 'void[]', logging the
Xlint message if it is found anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
UnresolvedType.signatureToName: fix '*' case for generic type '?'
In generic type lists, after a '*' in any type parameter list, sometimes
the '*' (which should be converted to '?') itself and always the
subsequent parameters would be missing from the signature:
- '[Pjava/util/Collection<*>;' yielded
'java.util.Collection<>[]', but should be
'java.util.Collection<?>[]'
- '[Pjava/util/Map<*Pjava/util/List<[Ljava/lang/Integer;>;>;' yielded
'java.util.Map<?>[]', but should be
'java.util.Map<?,java.util.List<java.lang.Integer[]>>[]'
This is now fixed.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
WildTypePattern: match generic type params correctly for array types
For array reference types, match type parameters on component type, not
on array type itself.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
WildTypePattern.toString: do not parenthesesise generic type list
It is unnecessary to represent a pattern list 'A,B,C' as '(A,B,C)'. Not
only does it look ugly in a type signature like 'org.acme.Foo<(A,B,C)>',
but also is it not valid Java syntax. While the latter might not be
strictly necessary in a String representation, it certainly is
desirable, if such representations are ever used to generate code or
@AspectJ pointcut annotations.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Method visit(WildAnnotationTypePattern, Object) used to descend into
node.getTypePattern().accept(this, data), which since commit 6585b9ef46
is unnecessary, because WildAnnotationTypePattern::traverse already
traverses its type pattern.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
SignaturePattern: Add exception for meta annotations
Upon meta annotation usage in signature patterns, lint warnings like the
following were issued during type parameter traversal:
does not match because annotation @java.lang.annotation.Inherited
has @Target{ElementType.ANNOTATION_TYPE} [Xlint:unmatchedTargetKind]
To avoid this, we now heuristically check if we are in a meta annotation
situation and, if so, permit it.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fixes #211. Previously, '?' was not converted to '*' in
UnresolvedType.nameToSignature, but kept as-is. That is why - falsely -
it was necessary to handle the '?' case in UnresolvedType.forSignature
at all, reading this kind of bogus signature and creating a type for it
in TypeFactory.createTypeFromSignature. This, ironically, led to correct
JVM generic type signatures containing '*' not being handled at all.
The conversion should now work correctly both ways.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Remove Apache Commons from 'lib' module, update remaining dependencies
Of beanutils, collections, digester and logging actually only digester
and logging are directly used in AspectJ code. Therefore, remove the
unused ones and upgrade the remaining libraries' versions to ones which
also have source JARs on Maven Central. This makes downloading sources
from GitHub and packaging separate commons.jar and commons-src.zip
artifacts superfluous. Hence, we can get rid of them completely.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
LangUtil: remove methods like 'is11VMOrGreater', 'is1dot5VMOrGreater'
Replace them by a uniform method 'isVMGreaterOrEqual(double)', also
overloaded for int.
This gets rid of one 'AspectJ_JDK_Update' tag. One less place to check
and update with each newly supported Java version. :-)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Globally replace "http:" by "https:" in non-XML files
Maybe, the XML files and Maven wrapper files will follow. First, let us
find out if this breaks the build, maybe some tests are asserting on
"http:". But there, the replacement would also have taken place, so
probably it just works.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Replace links to https://www.eclipse.org/aspectj/doc/next
This part of the website is outdated and will be deleted. Instead, link
to ADOCs right in the GitHub repository.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release
than directly a Java 22 release.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
NotTypePattern: Fix matching problem for negated type patterns
The implementation for boolean matchesArray(UnresolvedType type) was
buggy.
'!String' should match anything but String, no matter if it is
an array or not, e.g. int, void, int[], String[], String[][].
'!String[]' should match anything but String[], no matter if it is
an array or not, e.g. int, void, int[], String, String[][].
Fixes #257.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fixes spring-projects/spring-framework#27761.
Fixes #256.
Bridge methods are now ignored in favour of their overriding namesakes
during method matching.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add method ArrayReferenceType.equals to fix failing tests
This also fixes a bug. Previously, ResolvedType.equals was used for
equality check, and in there is a '==' comparison, which does not work
for two different ArrayReferenceType instances, even if the component
type is the same.
Relates to #246.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Fix PointcutRewriterTest, add LogicalPointcutStructure test helper class
After WildTypePattern.hashCode was fixed in the previous commit,
PointcutRewriterTest started failing, because in many places it was
falsely relying on a specific order of hash codes, which cannot be
guaranteed, especially since more instance fields are part of the hash
code now in accordance with 'equals'.
The new test helper class LogicalPointcutStructure is able to recognise
chained '&&' and '||' pointcuts of the same logical nesting level,
un-nesting them from the actual pointcut structure and making them
comparable, disregarding their order. I.e., something like
((A && B) && C) && D
is actually recognised to logically be
A && B && C && D
and equivalent to e.g. either of
D && B && A && C
A && B && D && C
C && A && D && B
This helps to compare rewritten pointcuts, as long as their logical
structure has not been altered.
Relates to #24.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
WildTypePattern: fix hashCode and toString methods
Especially 'hashCode' did not correspond to 'equals', disregarding
several fields, array dimension information being only one of them. This
led to parts of pointcuts being ignored, because they were regarded as
duplicates. Example:
execution(Foo* *(..)) && !execution(Foo*[] *(..))
Here, the negated pattern was falsely regarded as equal to the first
pattern, leading to an "A && !A" situation, i.e. no match at all.
Furthermore, 'toString' did not print array strings, i.e. instead of
"Foo*[][]" something like "Foo*" was printed. This false information was
also present in annotations generated by the weaver.
FuzzilyMatchingAspect was adjusted to actually match exactly once, as
expected, for the "Foo*" return types, i.e. exclusions for the array
return types have been added.
Relates to #24.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Handle one- and multi-dimensional array return types correctly
Fixes https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24, both the array
return type matching as such as well as matching dimensionality patterns
correctly. E.g., 'Foo*[]' is not the same as 'Foo*[][]'. This also works
correctly in combination with asterisks, even for primitive types, i.e.
'in*[][]' correctly matches a 2-dimensional array of 'int'.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Simplify if-else in WildTypePattern.matchesExactlyByName
A simple boolean condition is enough.
Loosely relates to https://github.com/eclipse/org.aspectj/issues/24, but
actually it is just drive-by cosmetics.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Alexander Kriegisch