Follow-up on previous rename-only commit. This time, the binaries are
real PNGs. The asciidoc and other references to them have also been
replaced. File figures_classes.png in the teaching materials also was
rotated by 90° to display it correctly.
Background: The Asciidoctor PDF back-end cannot handle GIFs directly
without an additional Ruby Gem. It is easier to only use PNGs and JPEGs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
The files are still GIFs for now. In the next steps after the rename,
they will be replaced by real PNGs.
Background: The Asciidoctor PDF back-end cannot handle GIFs directly
without an additional Ruby Gem. It is easier to only use PNGs and JPEGs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Rename Visio files for images used in compiler-weaver.adoc
to match the GIF file names, so it is easy to recognise which Visio file
was used to create which GIF, even if no Visio viewer is available.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Also rename ADOC on the way and move images to subdirectory.
This makes the Maven Resource execution superfluous.
TODO: Adjust image links in compiler-weaver.adoc in next commit.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Before, only one image was referenced, consisting of a screenshot of two
diagrams. The other image file, containing just one of the diagrams, was
not used. Now, both images have been cropped correctly and are both
referenced separately from the release notes.
Better late than never...
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Move release notes README-*.adoc to separate directory
Also move two more release-related documents.
All referenced images are now in a common subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- AspectJ Browser (ajbrowser)
- Forte IDE integration
- JBuilder IDE integration
- Emacs integration
All this information was old and outdated. Ajbrowser was removed from
AspectJ a while ago. If the other tools even still exist, any possibly
existing AspectJ support is not part of AspectJ itself.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
User relative paths for images instead.
In one case, we need to copy images from a subdirectory one level up,
because otherwise the images are only found in the included document,
but not in the single-page one including it from the subdirectory. In
all other cases, included ADOCs are located in the same directory as the
including document.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- The website is just a front page.
- I failed to contact anyone via:
* fb9553b7471df638478bbf918044bf52.gdrp@customers.whoisprivacycorp.com
* info@aosd.net
* admin@aosd.net
- The discuss@aosd.net mailing list had its last post 6 years ago and
the last one concerning AspectJ 11 years ago according to the archive
at https://discuss.aosd.narkive.com/.
Mention Spring support for native AspectJ an Spring AOP as a real world
example in the FAQ.
Also remove an FAQ link to a no longer existing PARC website about
AspectJ and fix a small typo.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
- Add Java syntax highlighting to AspectJ and Java files
- Add XML syntax highlighting to XML files (Ant, LTW etc.)
- Dedent and remove empty lines, where necessary
- Enclose in-line line numbers for Java code in /*23*/ comments in order
to enable Java formatting
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Add initial set of AsciiDoc files, converted from HTML/XML
Some originals have been deleted already. Others, especially the user
guides, still exist in both formats because they have not been
proof-read and probably lots of links do not function as expected. But I
want to see what the files look like directly on GitHun.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Use new constant Main.MINIMAL_JRE_VERSION (currently = 17) and
SourceVersion.latest().ordinal() to check, if the minimal JRE version
requirement for AJC is met. If not, then exit with code -1 and error
message "The AspectJ compiler needs at least Java runtime 17".
Relates to #269.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
The new version is compiled to target 17. This should avoid the strange
"NoSuchFieldError: RELEASE_17" error message in AJC.
Closes #269.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Currently, the situation looks more like a Java 21 maintenance release
than directly a Java 22 release.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kriegisch <Alexander@Kriegisch.name>
Alexander Kriegisch